Clinical Indigo · Refractive Biomechanics

The Cap–Residual-Stroma Trade-off in CLEAR / SMILE

For a fixed cornea and a fixed lenticule, Cap + Lenticule + Residual stroma = CCT. A thicker cap preserves more of the strong anterior lamellae — but costs residual stroma in equal measure. This tool shows both quantities at once: tensile strength rises while the margin to the RSB floor shrinks.

Inputs

Move the cap slider and watch the trade-off live.

drag the dial · 90–160 µm
Lenticule parameters (Munnerlyn)

Max thickness ≈ (OZ² · (|Sph| + |Cyl|))/3 + min. thickness (Z8-settable). Approximation — real Z8 CLEAR plan values differ. Uncheck the box above to enter a known lenticule value manually.

Residual stroma (RSB)
345µm
Cap + Lenticule + RSB = CCT
Margin to floor
+95µm
RSB − floor
Residual tensile strength · CLEAR
84%
intact cap + residual stroma
LASIK equivalent · flap severed
55%
Δ = cap contribution: 29 pts

Corneal cross-section

Depth, anterior (top) to posterior

Cap (intact) Lenticule removed Residual stroma

Tensile strength by depth

Randleman approximation: strongest anteriorly, declining posteriorly. Area = load borne.

Cap bears Residual stroma bears removed
The one insight

Why “go deeper” doesn't solve it — and what actually helps

Your biomechanics are right: a deeper cap pushes the lenticule into a weaker zone and keeps more strong anterior lamellae intact → residual tensile strength rises. But because the sum is fixed, the residual stroma falls in lockstep toward the floor.

Ectasia is a bulging of the posterior bed, not a tensile failure. The intact cap “floats” on the partially decoupled interface — it cannot stabilise a razor-thin RSB. That is why the floor governs even though tensile strength looks better on paper. The Z8 input mask isn't wrong — it's conservative by design.

With a high ablation, the real lever isn't cap depth (fixed sum!) but lenticule volume — smaller optical zone / lower correction — or patient selection via CCT.